|
Dirigibles, Airships, Zeppelins and
Blimps
A recent television documentary on the German airship
Hindenburg began with the announcement that it
would first explore the history of "dirigibles,
known as Zeppelins" - a typical example of the
welter of ignorance and confusion into which the
terminology of lighter-than-air flight has fallen. This
article will attempt to sort out the semantic muddle,
for an understanding of the terms in its title can be
important to an understanding of some aerial aspects of
the Great War.
There are two forms of lighter-than-air-craft the
balloon and the airship; the generic term for both is
aerostat. Both are able to ascend into the sky and stay
there because they contain a substance that is lighter
than the air that surrounds them.
Hot air was the balloon's first lifting substance,
but is limited flight time because of the simple fact
that heated air will eventually cool. Sustained hot-air
ballooning did not become feasible until after World War
II with the innovation of the propane burner, which
permits reheating while the craft is aloft.
For more than a century the principal and preferred
lifting substance for both balloons and airships was
hydrogen, the lightest of the elements, despite it being
highly dangerous because of its extreme flammability. It
was not succeeded by helium (which although somewhat
inferior to hydrogen in lifting strength will not burn
or explode) until a crash American research program
beginning in 1917 developed means of extracting it
cheaply in large quantities from the natural gas in
which it is found. Today the aeronautical employment of
helium is slight, but is has host of important
industrial, scientific and medical uses.
The fundamental difference between the airship and
the balloon is that the former is powered and
horizontally controllable and the latter is neither. The
altitude of a free-floating balloon can be regulated to
a considerable degree by dropping ballast and venting
gas, but its horizontal direction is determined solely
by which way the prevailing wind blows it. It is
therefore incorrect to refer to balloonists, as modern
journalists so often do, as "pilots" - a
balloon cannot be piloted in any sense of the word.
Add propulsion and control to a balloon and you have
an airship, the first four crude examples of which flew
in France if only haltingly and briefly between 1852 and
1884, decades before the Wright brothers created the
first verifiably successful powered heavier-than-air
flying machine. 1
The French connection is how and why the word
"dirigible" entered English as a synonym for
"airship." It comes from the French word
dirigeable the adjectival form of the
transitive verb diriger, which means, among
other things, to control or steer. Thus, with
incontestable Gallic logic, a steerable lighter-than-air
craft was called a ballon dirigeable.
Eventually ballon was dropped and the adjective
became the noun; thus dirigeable remains to
this day the French term for airship. It was the same
process by which cuirasse from vaisseau
cuirasse (literally "armored ship")
became the French term for battleship.
Like so many French aeronautical coinages (aileron,
fuselage, nacelle, hangar, even the very word aviation
itself), the French term, with a change in spelling,
entered English as "dirigible balloon." And
again, the adjective eventually became the noun but it
was not in widespread use until after the Great War. The
preferred word was airship, which replaced the
cumbersome "dirigible balloon." The exact same
word was adopted in German - Luftschiff
(luft: air; schiff: ship).
Dirigible as a synonym for airship is actually a
misnomer. Since dirigible means, as noted above, simply
"steerable," it can logically be applied to
any device whose direction can be controlled by human
agency even a bicycle. In scientific usage, however, it
has been restricted to aeronautical application;
anything from a kite to a jetliner can be called
"dirigible." (This restriction was not always
the case; in the early stages of naval torpedo
development the type that was controlled by unreeling
wire was sometimes termed dirigible.)
By the start of the Great War the airship had been
developed into two main types - rigid and non-rigid
(technically, the latter is more accurately described as
pressure-rigid). Cylindrical in cross-section, both were
given buoyancy by gas and motion by engine-driven
propellers and were controlled by vertical rudders and
horizontal elevators.
In the rigid type, a solid framework, which might be
likened to a skeleton, supports an external covering of
fabric called the envelope (a very few experimental
types had a metallic covering). Within the framework are
contained bags of gas called balloonets. In the
non-rigid, the envelope's shape is maintained by the
pressure of the gas that fills it; there is no
framework. The rigid's control car and engines are
suspended from the framework; in the non-rigid they are
attached directly to or suspended directly from the
envelope. (In some later rigids the engines were mounted
internally, driving the propellers by transmission
belts.)
There was an intermediate type, now long vanished,
called the semi-rigid. It had a pressure-rigid envelope
but a solid keel.
The rigid airship, employed so extensively by Germany
during the Great War, was perfected soon after the turn
of the century by a former Wurttenberg army cavalry
officer, Ferdinand Adolf August Heinrich Graf
von Zeppelin, who had been inspired by a balloon ascent
he had made in the United States on 19-Aug-1863. 2 His craft were, naturally ,
known as Zeppelins. "Zeppelin" is a
proprietary, or trade, name (such as Kodak, Ferris Wheel
and Autogiro), and is applied properly only to craft
constructed by Luftshiffbau Zeppelin G.m.b.H. or firms
licensed to use its patents. It should thus be spelled
with a capital Z; modern writers who spell it in lower
case are mistaken in their apparent belief that it is
generic. 3
It has become customary to refer to all German rigid
airships of the Great War as Zeppelins, but in fact not
all were. Some were constructed by a rival firm,
Luftschiffbau Schutte-Lanz G.m.b.H., which employed a
framework of laminated plywood instead of the aluminum
alloy used in Zeppelins. 4
The vast amount of literature devoted to German
airships can easily, and has, led to the belief that
these were the dominant LTA craft of the Great War.
Actually, the British navy was the greatest exponent of
the airship, receiving more than 200 non-rigids during
1915-1918 for anti-submarine patrolling. This type was
also used, although in far fewer numbers, by the U.S.
Navy and the French and Italian armies and navies. The
German army and navy also had a handful.
The rigid airship no longer exists; none has been
built since the 1930s. 5
The demise is usually blamed on the Hindenburg
disaster 6 although that
had been preceded by the loss of a number of American,
British, French and Italian rigids. All airships flying
today are non-rigid types, popularly known as blimps.
A number of theories have been advanced concerning
the etymology of "blimp," but in fact it is an
onomatopoeic word whose coinage can be traced
specifically to 5-Dec-1915 when Royal Naval Air Service
Lieutenant A. D. Cunningham playfully flicked a finger
against the envelope of SS. 12 at the Capel air station
and then mimicked aloud the sound It had made.
"Blimp," then, is essentially a slang term,
although it was given one official cachet in Jul-1943
when the U.S. Navy, the only service in the world to
operate airships during World War II, inexplicably
changed the designation "airship patrol
squadron:" to "blimp squadron."
Modern airships serve a number of utilitarian
functions, but they remain relative oddities in the sky
and are generally known only as flying billboards and
for flashing advertising messages and transmitting
television images of sporting events. And modern media
ignorance of lighter-than-air history has resulted in
the distortions of its nomenclature that I hope this
article will help rectify. 7
Space precludes a list of sources, but I will be glad
to supply a bibliography to anyone interested.
Notes:
1
The first of the French airships was powered by a steam
engine, the next two by human muscle and the fourth, and
most successful, by an electric motor. The airship,
however, like the airplane, did not become a truly
viable proposition until the advent of the internal
combustion engine.
2
Much nonsense has been written about Zeppelin's American
sojourn. He was an official military observer accredited
to the Union army. He was not a volunteer in that army
or a balloon observer for it; he did not study
aeronautics under Thaddeus S. C. Lowe; these is no
evidence that he ever laid eyes on a Union army balloon.
The ascent given him in St. Paul, Minnesota, by John
Steiner, a former Union army civilian balloonist, was
his only such experience. See Hans von Schiller,
Zeppelin: Wegbereiter des Weltluftverkehrs (Bad
Godesberg: Kirschbaum Verlag,
1967).
3 It is almost
never noted that three of the U.S. Navy's four rigid
airships, the Los Angeles, Akron and
Macon were Zeppelins. The Los Angeles
was built by Luftschiffbau Zeppelin under the
reparations terms of the peace treaty and the other two
were constructed by the Goodyear-Zeppelin Corporation,
formed in 1923 as a subsidiary of the Goodyear Tire and
Rubber Company. This firm acquired Zeppelin patents and
imported key Zeppelin aeronautical engineers who played
a leading role in the design of the Akron and
Macon and several other airships. For obvious
reason, "Zeppelin" was dropped from the firm's
name during World War II and it became Goodyear
Aircraft.
4 Most
Schutte-Lanz ships were employed by the German army. The
commander of the Naval Airship Division,
Fregattenkapitan Peter Strasser, disliked them
because of their wooden
construction.
5 The
last three, the American Los Angeles and the
German Graf Zeppelin and Graf Zeppelin
II, were all broken up in 1944. The first two had
not flown for several years, the third only a few times.
Many proposals for a revival of the rigid airship have
been made in recent years, but nothing has come of any
of them.
6 It is
rarely noted that the Hindenburg disaster was
the first and only time in all of airship history that
paying civilian passengers lost their lives. Many
theories, from plausible to fantastic, have been
advanced to explain what caused the airship's hydrogen
to ignite., but the truth remains unknown and probably
always will. There is a popular belief that the tragedy
was caused indirectly by the U.S. government's refusal
to permit the sale of helium, of which the United States
then had a virtual monopoly, to Nazi Germany. That story
is far more complex too complicated to go into here. The
belief is also belied by the fact that the
Hindenburg was designed from the start to be
lifted by hydrogen (because of the disparity in lifting
strength between hydrogen and helium, weights and
stresses have to be calculated differently in the design
of airships intended to use one or the
other).
7 In
fairness, it should be pointed out that the 1991
documentary "Rubber Planes" produced for the
Discovery television channel is in general quite
accurate. |